UK Chilcot inquiry: phoney inquiry

majority british population have been against the war all along, and they ignore public opinion and legal advice, and made the decision to invade. it is no coincidence that the 4 politicians who brought UK to war, tony blair, jack straw, lord falconer and lord goldsmith are all lawyers. what bunch of hypocritical bastards!

the war has caused and still causing civilian and combatant deaths. In iraq more than 400 people died in violent incidents last months alone; more than 1,400 wounded. millions of iqaqis are still displaced. someone should be held responsible and pay for the crime. benality of evil is more suitable to be applied here than its original use in israeli trial of adolf erichman.

if they have the time and energy to put on the cheap show, why not have a referendum to let british public decide whether to withdraw troops from iraq and afghanistan. it is like a rapist is starts an enquiry to show his legal seriousness and yet at the same time still doing the raping.

as oliver miles pointed out, john chilcot was a member of the hutton inquiry and has been closely involved with the security services. baronness prashar has no relevant experience, sir roderic lyne was a serving ambassador at the time of the war. the other two members are historicans, both stronge supporters of tonny blair. martin gilbert, wrote theat bush and blair may well with the passage of time and the opening of the archives join the ranks of roosevelt and churchill. lawrence freedman is the reputed architect of the blair doctrine of humanitarian intervention. they are both jewish and have a record of active support for zionism.

my take of this is, the inquiry is phoney, the country does not need the inquiry to acquire the truth, they already have it, but just could not face it.

There is no chance that the Chilcot enquiry will address the fundamental issues of the Iraq war, as the biography of its 5 members makes plain:

1. John Chilcot
Career diplomat, close links to British intelligence. Member of the Butler Inquiry that exonerated the government on intelligence about Weapons of Mass Destruction,

2. Roderic Lyne
Governor of Ditchley Foundation, which promotes Anglo-American relations ? director Sir Jeremy Greenstock, UK Permanent Representative to the United Nations in the approach to Iraq war and witness at the Inquiry.

3. Lawrence Freedman
Member of Ditchley Foundation, architect of the ?Blair doctrine? on the use of military action for ?humanitarian? intervention, Freedman was asked to provide ?a philosophy that Blair could call his own? (John Kampfner, Blair?s Wars).

4. Baroness Prashar
Member of Ditchley Foundation.

5. Martin Gilbert
Historian, well-known for extreme pro-Zionist views. On Iraq war said that Bush and Blair ?may well, with the passage of time and the opening of the archives, join the ranks of Roosevelt and Churchill.?

For more information, see Kevin Blowe (www.blowe.org.uk) and Craig Murray (http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2009/11/iraq_inquiry_th.html).

The Iraq war has killed over 1 million Iraqis, made 4.5 million Iraqis refuges (1 in 6 of the population), left 60% of households without access to clean water, 5 million children orphans, and 20% chronically malnourished.

Its architects in Britain ? Tony Blair and others ? have, however, nothing to fear from the Chilcot Enquiry.

normally the law in this country are effective and efficient(maybe too efficient and ethusiastic) in dealing with minor offences such as traffic and parking offences, bailiffs are sent out like mad dogs to pursue every penny out of the offenders.the reason maybe very simple: minor offenders are not those who control the law, law does not serve them.

journalists reporting enough current affairs must feel either cynical or despair of the systematic nonsense, if they do not, it is either due to their lack of understanding or screwed up moral compasses.