Saturday, 9 January 2010

RT Ads


Akmal Shaikh:UK government and media

if gordon brown or david miliband really wanted to save Akmal Shaikh from chinese execution, they shouldn't have made all those loud protests and pr gestures, instead they should have made behind scene diplomacy. UK as one of the big five in the un security council, could have made a deal easily with chinese to save Akmal Shaikh's life 10 times by satisfying china in other areas, say, making some ambiguous statement on the us arms sale to taiwan, or on tibet to make chinese happy.

What the UK government has done was just some cynical PR practice, to make chinese authoirty look bad and win certain domestic constituencies.

Also i think the media here made partial reports of Akmal Shaikh case. Unlike what was reported by british media, chinese reports mentioned chinese legal authority did take and considered the evidence provided by uk officials and psychologists. The plea on psychological ground was rejected in the same way as Akmal Shaikh was sentenced to death, all done by Chinese law and proceture. Chinese laws do grant leniency on psychological ground.

Whether China has a independent justice system, or Akmal Shaikh had bipolar disorder, is another matter for discussion.

Scooterassassin's interesting comment:


It's quite perplexing.

The chinese government stated that there was no historical record of the poor guy ever being ill: that is - no record of being hospitalised and treated for bipolar affective disorder; no history of treatment by his GP for mental disorder; no history of detention and sectioning under mental health legislation before he came to China.

The British government have never refuted this point: all the British government have offered, is that Mr Sheikh appears mentally ill (now) in China after he had was caught with a trunk load of illicit drugs. They do make a good case to cast reasonable doubt.

What troubles me, is the double standards of the British government, and in particular, the BBC. If the Communist Party were so inhumane for making no exception to executing a man who could have potentially killed thousands more with illegal drugs, which might be mitigated because of his mental illness, then why was he not diagnosed and treated correctly in the United Kingdom?

If the United Kingdom is so high up in terms of being a humanitarian society enough to lecture China on morality and humanitarian law, , how is it, that the United Kingdom failed to treat this man for his mental illness, after 50+ years, and then to expect, a foreign country, with capital punishment, which the UK only abolished as recently as 60 or so years ago, to 'recognise' that he has a mental illness, which they never treated him for?

How is it, that the UK recognises 1 in 7 people suffer from depression, and that most benefit from psychological therapies, but are never offered much more than a 6 month waiting list? Or perhaps those parents who have to carry the weight of the world on their shoulders, and advocate for their autistic children to access education, and end up having to take the local education authority to court?

The newspapers say that the judges in the final hearing in China, were laughing when they heard his testimony. The BBC reporters, deign to think that they can interpret everything for the British masses, and state unequivocally, that the judges were 'amused' by his testimony, which was clearly that of a mad man. They do not account for the reaction of the judges, which is similar to 'throwing out of court'.

I don't know what to think. Innocent men have been executed and imprisoned in many British miscarriages of justice. Sometimes pointing the fingers at others, only shows us how ugly the system we believe and grew up in, really is.

On the other hand, it's heart-breaking thinking that there is that real possibility, that he might have been mentally ill: and failed by the UK in terms of not being able to access mental health services. That is the UK's duty to its citizens. We won't ask newspaper journalists to undertake any moral duty to think about their duty instead of the knee-jerk protectionism.

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

Chinese Princelings: Family Background Advantage

Chinese Princelings: Family Background Advantage in social and career advancement. Of course it is not a phenomenon unique to China. Except for those advocates for radical revolution, one cannot expect China could eradicate the problem overnight. The history since 1949 shows what a revolution has achieved is to replace old aristocracy with a new one.

European model, esp. Britain, is to have those aristocracy with their privileges diluted over the time, gradually commoners' rights increased. Hence the key to judge Chinese society and politics is to determine which way they are going, by the standards of European model, to a more equal society or a society of more disparity.

习近平――国家副主席(副总理习仲勋之子)
贺国强――中央纪委书记(毛泽东之妻贺子珍侄子)
周永康――中央政法委书记(江泽民外甥女婿)
李长春――中央政治局常委 (中央副主席李德生之子)
王岐山――副总理(副总理姚依林女婿)
回良玉――副总理(江泽民儿女亲家)
李源潮――中央组织部部长(李干成之子)
戴秉国――国务委员(文化部部长黄镇女婿)
刘延东――国务委员(农业部常务副部长刘瑞龙之女)
俞正声――上海市委书记(一机部长黄敬之子;母亲是北京市副市长)
薄熙来 ――重庆是市委书记(副总理薄一波之子)
周小川――中国人民银行行长(机械工业部、建设部部长周建南之子)
温云松――北京优创科技有限公司总裁(温家宝之子)
徐明 ――大连实德集团总裁(温家宝女婿)
江泽慧――政协人资环委副主任(江泽民之妹)
江绵恒――中国科学院副院长(江泽民长子)
江绵康――城市发展信息中心主任江绵康(江泽民幼子)
李小鹏――华能国际集团董事长,亚洲电王(李鹏之子)
李小琳――中国电力国际有限公司执行董事兼总经理(李鹏之女)
朱云来――中国国际金融公司总裁、董事(朱基之子)
朱燕来――中国银行(香港)发展规划部总经理(朱基之女)
邹家华――原国务院副总理(叶剑英女婿,邹韬奋之子)
李南征 ――石家庄陆军指挥学院副院长、少将(中央副主席李德生之子)
罗干 ――原中央政治局常委,中央政法委书纪(元帅罗荣桓之子)
罗东进――解放军二炮副政委、中将(元帅罗荣桓之子)
曾庆红――原国家副主席(1938.09,江西吉安人,原内政部长曾山之子)
曾庆洋――军事科学院军事历史部部长、少将(曾山之子)
曾庆源――解放军空军后勤部副部长、少将(曾山之子)
曾海生―― 总参办公厅副主任、少将(曾山之女)
俞强声――北京市国安局处长,1986年叛逃美国(黄敬之子)
蒋祝平――前湖北省委书记(蒋南翔之子)
谷开来――薄熙来之妻(前副总理谷牧之女)
薄熙成――北京六合安消防科技有限公司董事长(前副总理薄一波之子郑耀文――原驻丹麦大使(薄一波女婿)
田成平――山西省委书记(田英之子)
白克明――河北省委书记(白坚之子)
廖晖 ――全国政协副主席(全国人大副委员长廖承志之子)
吴志明――上海市政法委书记(江泽民王冶坪外甥)
何光炜――国家旅游局局长(原全国政协副主席何长工之子)
汪光焘――建设部部长(原上海市市长汪道涵之子)
汪静香――港新兴公司总裁(汪道涵之女)
林炎志――吉林省委副书记(原全国人大副委员长林枫之子)
胡德平――全国工商联副主席(原中央总书记胡耀邦长子)
刘湖 ――华润集团常务董事、副总经理(胡耀邦次子)
李铁映――全国人大副委员长(原全国人大副委员长李维汉之长子)
李铁林――中组部常务副部长兼中央机构编委办主任(李维汉之幼子)
洪虎 ――全国人大法律委员会副主任委员(原全国政协副主席洪学智之子)
洪豹 ――天津警备区副司令员、少将(洪学智之子)
滕久明――中央组织部巡视组副部级巡视专员(前全国政协副主席滕代远之子)
粟戎生――北京军区副司令员、中将(粟裕之子)
乔宗淮――中国外交部副部长、领导成员(乔冠华之子)
陈昊苏――中国人民对外友好协会会长(元帅陈毅之子)
陈丹淮――总装备部科技部部长(陈毅之子)
陈晓鲁――北京标准国际投资管理公司董事长(粟裕女婿,陈毅之子)
王光亚――外交部副部长(陈毅女婿)
陈珊珊――原外交部司局级领导(陈毅之女,丈夫是王光亚)
刘卓明――解放军海军装备论证中心主任、少将(前国家副主席刘华清之子)
刘朝英――北京长城公司经理部经理(国家副主席刘华清之女 )
潘岳 ――国家环保总局副局长(国家副主席刘华清女婿 )
刘友凡――湖北省副省长(国家副主席刘华清侄子)
黄远志――中纪委驻中南巡视组组(徐向前内侄)
许援朝――南京军区装备部副部长(许世友之子)
叶选平 ――原全国政协常务副主席(元帅叶剑英之子)
伍绍祖――原国家体育总局局长(原中央军委秘书长伍云甫之子)
何道泉――国防大学副校长(全国政协副主席何长工之子)
周尔钧――国防大学政治部主任(周恩来之侄)
李肇星――外交部长(外交部领事司司长秦力真女婿)
秦小梅――中国外交官联谊会副会长(李肇星夫人)
李禾禾――美国德尔计算机公司高级职员(李肇星之子)
秦晓鹰――财经杂志社社长(李肇星妻弟)
徐文伯――文化部副部长(大将徐海东之子)
该资讯来源:

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

bloody westminster council and their legal hounds


the bastard who causes all the misery

I had a few PCNs issued by the westminster council, but had them all settled in early 2009. After that my family members have been subject to continous harrassment by letters and in persons from the baillif threatening to remove my bike and my car parked in my drive way. On June 30, 2009 I finally got an emaill from Ravindra, Chalky's executive assistant, saying all my PCNs had been settled and i should not be bothered by their agent.

This afternoon just now, a man from that legal firm hired by the westminster council went to my home again, when i am working in office. My young niece was at home alone, she was scared to death when the baillif threatened to remove my bike and other properties today if i had not made the payment immediately.

I was forced to check with the council and later the baillif phoned and said it was just a cockup, he did not even apologize. I am going to consult a lawyer to see what i can do about this year-long harrassment.

The following is some suggestion from motocyclist friends:

I would certainly be placing this in the hands of my solicitor for the distress and harassment they have caused you and your family.

I would add up how much this has cost you in time/phone calls and letters and sent Westminster a invoice, when they don't pay take them to the small claims court.


even more detailed information:

i suggest you contact this man as he may be able to help:
Adi Tahiri
Bairstow Eves Countrywide
34 Baker Street
London
W1U 3EU
Tel: 020 7935 0355 / 07818 023 884
e: adi.bakerstreet@bairstoweves.co.uk


another good suggestion:

It might be worth contacting the news media (GMTV, BBC London, Evening Standard etc.) to see if they are interested in this, especially as it has a 'human interest' angle in the form of a single, young & lone female feeling terrified and intimidated.

You would have to think about whether that might upset your niece even more though as journalists are far more focused on 'getting the story' than worrying about the feelings of the folk they interview.


more suggestion:

write or call the baliff company and ask for a written apology of a letter confirming that a baliff had called at your door... then use it to sue Westminster!!


more suggestion:

Your stress and suffering is, after all, entirely down to Westminster's complete incompetence in engaging Bailiffs a) when you had paid your penalties and b) having done so, failed to notify them that there was no further need for their 'services'.

Bailiffs will always be, and act like, total arseholes and use every threatening tactic available to terrorise you into meeting their demands. The real fault, as I say, is with Westminster's inability to think in a joined-up manner.

Having had the Bailiff's set upon you, it may have other implications - I do not know for sure but, given the amount of personal data held by the state and bandied around between various organisations, it may be the sort of thing that flags up on say, a credit rating check or a CRB enquiry.
Maybe I'm paranoid, but it may worth finding out sooner rather than later.

Certainly a speculative solicitors letter may yield some result: many Councils may make some recompense if they're worried about getting sued for something.


more suggestion:

It wouldn't show up on a CRB check as it's a civil debt, not non payment of a Court imposed fine.
Still sue the f***ers for every penny you can get though!!


Chaulky's assistant replies:

Dear xxx

I have spoken to Parking Services and can confirm that the bailiffs have been instructed not to pursue you for payment. Parking Services will be confirming this information in writing and apologise for any inconvenience that may have been caused you and your family.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you require further assistance.

Kind regards

Ravi

Monday, 4 January 2010

an old posting on chinese martial art

武术下技也

送交者: 转贴 于 June 11, 2004 08:52:16:


中土两件事情比较令人费解:一是养生长寿,二是武术。养生之术,气功也好,土老道也好,一生的大部分时间里戒这戒那,清心寡欲,换得高龄苟延残喘几年,实 际上等于把一生中最好光阴至于半死不活的状态,换得一些夕阳光阴。武术是多少年受自残,皮肉之苦,把指头练成钳子,拳头连成铁锤,jb缩肚里,换得有朝一 日能朝对手发出致命一击。这种愚公移山,铁杵成针的思路,实际上是舍近求远,自欺欺人。

武术受推崇,甚至被神鬼化(特别是金大虾,这是后话),不过是因为其本土性。中国式摔跤动作简洁实用,从科学训练到可检验效果,都高出武术。记得 哪年有北京武术队的某个什么拳的冠军(是女队还是男队忘了)晚上走在外面被人强暴了。除非那个强徒是内蒙摔跤队的,否则这就再次说明武术是花拳绣腿。所谓 中国式摔跤名称诞生在新中国后,其实就是新朝重新开展了旧朝(满清)的演布库。布库,蒙古语,“力士”。

清王朝结束后,八旗善扑营解散,布库(汉语为撩脚)流落民间,天桥,京津地区的民间摔跤才有了大发展。“勾子”,“坎子”,“跋脚”和“别子”这类摔跤术 语,都来自布库。现在摔跤的褡裢,就源自布库跤衣,也就是蒙古式摔跤的皮褡裢。中国摔跤没有阔裤腿和布靴,也是49年后的事情。

布库有“大绊三十六,小绊如牛毛”之说。摔跤没有武术的神秘性和迷信色彩,训练方法亦科学得多,因为摔跤所有技能,同西洋拳击一样,在训练中合理分解成 manageable parts,容易掌握,能够检验。柔道有类似摔跤的各种技法,相朴有所谓四十八手。日本现在最牛的横纲级力士就是位蒙古布库,绰号“朝青龙”。 蒙古跤虽然经过多种演变,但传统却绵延不绝。

日本相扑由唐宋传到日本,日本一直保持下来。相朴运动从汉朝和匈奴时期就有,但是并没有保持下来。蒙古旧时摔跤和现在国际摔跤类似,倒地后继续跤力直到完全制服对手,后来演变成倒地即输。满清的演布库来自蒙古,契丹。汉地武术发达,也是在明朝的时候,可见金庸胡扯。

金大虾有一点是对的,即中国武术就是江湖上的玩意。什么东西一流落江湖,不衰败,起码也不会专业化。想象一下国家体委的乒乓球,中南海的厨艺流落 民间是个神马下场。国家体委培养乒乓球国手,需要高水平的陪练,科研,硬设施,长期积累的经验和传统…这个程度的物质条件在江湖上,也就是社会闲杂人员, 是承担不起的。当然物质不能决定一切,中国足球队(男队)永久性疲软,就证明了物质代替不了精神。

金庸宣扬江湖出高人,基本上是金庸的小说————鬼话连篇。中国武术的百花齐放,百家争鸣的局面,说白了,就是业余而已,缺乏专业标准嘛。更有害 的是,金大虾实际上宣扬精神代替物质,和历史不沾边,也反科学。西方百年来的船坚炮利,中国落后挨打,让人们了解了西洋科技,专业的长处,但还是留下了一 些死角,中国功夫崇拜就算一个(还有中医,相术等残余)。金庸神化(鬼化)中国功夫,对江湖武术顶礼膜拜,对本民族的上技,即满族承自蒙古契丹的摔跤,完 全漠视和无知,算是满人汉化的典范。金大虾做专职历史学教授(听说还要写中国通史),说明中国学问已经成了江湖下技。


武术崇拜者喜欢提霍元甲。霍击败俄国力士,说明不了太多,现在国内的某个武术选手打败俄罗斯一个几流拳手也不是不可能。就是夯港的半文盲爱整那些 个闹剧,霍元甲,陈真…。 李小龙了不起,在海外弘扬了一把武术,一改唐人街厨师逆来顺受的形象,成功地塑造了敢动拳脚的大厨形象,不过呢,在西方法制社会,那叫 vigilantism,民团自卫5的,黑人就是那样。

Useless Chinese Kungfu

中国武术

[作者:王开 | 来源:瞭望东方周刊 ]

练习散打的原因是当时中国武术套路表演走向了世界,并获得国际好评,影响力越来越大。相对来讲,为众多搏击爱好者所熟知的泰拳王播求与中国散打冠军孙涛的对抗,更像一次上规格的对决。

  传统武术在攻防技术中掺杂了大量象征性动作和门派仪式动作,从功法上看,传统武术仍保留着很原始、低效的操习,与其说是增长格斗实力,倒不如说是在祈祷、苦行和磨炼耐心

  梅惠志第一次真正接触泰拳是在1990年。当时,作为北京武术散打队的首任总教练,他带队参加刚刚设立的京港搏击会,虽然带去的都是当时的国家级顶级散打高手,但那一次中国散打惨败于泰拳。

  “没办法,我一看到泰拳用肘用膝,就只好丢毛巾。”梅惠志说,当时,北京武术散打 队第一次出国,根本不懂什么是自由搏击,对泰拳的膝肘攻击很不适应。“与泰拳硬碰硬,我们根本打不过,拳脚打在对手身上,跟打在皮球上一样。而当时我们的 队员抗击打能力比较差,挨上两三下膝肘就不行了。”

  此次惨败之后,梅惠志等人才把泰拳的录像拿回来反复研究。“泰拳非常硬朗,主要使用边腿和膝肘。他们的记分主要是以击倒而定的,所以踢你时一下是一下,你的重拳他们根本就不躲。但我们的散手没人家能挨打,散打只有发挥摔法的优势才有取胜的机会。”梅惠志说。

  不久前泰拳拳王放言要秒杀中国功夫,无论是否炒作,让人们再次审视声名在外而又难以捉摸的中国功夫,如果站上擂台,竞技力究竟几何?

  散打为何难敌泰拳

  梅惠志是北京市散打运动的创办者。上世纪70年代末80年代初,作为北京什刹海业余体校国际式摔跤教练,他在北京武术队主教练吴彬和中国式摔跤教练李宝如的协助下,开始练习散打。

  练习散打的原因是当时中国武术套路表演走向了世界,并获得国际好评,影响力越来越大。许多外国的武术爱好者来到中国,都想与“中国功夫”较量较量。尤其是李连杰主演的电影《少林寺》上映之后,中国功夫实战能力如何,成为一个亟待证明的焦点。

  “那个时候来挑战的国外武术爱好者,很多都由我来对付。”梅惠志说。但来较量的一般都不是职业搏击手,由摔跤转为散打的职业运动员梅惠志完全能够应付得来。“在1990年第一次带队参加京港搏击会之前,我们对世界上的整体搏击状态并不了解。”

  其实,中国功夫与泰拳的较量一直在进行着。目前可以查到的资料显示,从1921年开始,中国功夫就在向泰拳发起攻击。但除了1922年,由流亡泰国,本有武功,并拜华裔泰拳宗师为师的李德与泰拳手打平之外,其余皆遭惨败。

  而1958年至上世纪80年代,由香港和台湾组织的数次中国功夫与泰拳的比赛,也仅有一场平局,其余都告失败,而且败得相当惨,最短的一局仅坚持了20秒。

  但近几年,散打所代表的中国功夫在与泰拳的对抗中,却出现了赢多输少的局面。“双方研究规则,泰拳可以用肘膝,我们可以用摔法,做好针对性练习,赢面比较大。”梅惠志说。

  不过,近几年的中泰对抗赛,中国散打的成绩受到了不少武术爱好者的质疑。人们在有限的中泰对抗录像中,以及各种中泰对抗赛中国散打大获全胜的消息中,资质并没有多对泰拳手的来历及少了解。

  相对来讲,为众多搏击爱好者所熟知的泰拳王播求与中国散打冠军孙涛的对抗,更像一 次上规格的对决。在这次比赛中,播求很顺利地拿下了孙涛。这个结局似乎并不是那么令人难以接受---从双方的简历可以看出,作为职业泰拳手,播求在日本最 知名的站立综合搏击赛事K-1上风靡全球,其成绩是170战,155胜;而作为中国体制内的运动员,孙涛的比赛次数只有24战。

  民间并无武功高手

  虽然,从中国功夫与泰拳的对抗历史中,中国传统武术的成绩还不如散打来的好看,但大多数中国人仍然相信,真正的中国武术的技击精华是在民间,在传统拳术中。虽然没有任何确实的证据证明这一点,但人们更愿意相信,在那些与世隔绝的密境,有神仙般的武林高手存在。

  “虽然存在民间有高手这一说法,但民间拳手的水平并不高。与散打相比,基本没有对抗性。”梅惠志说,他曾经会过许多民间高手,“很多都坚持不到十秒八秒。”

  而在1980年和1981年,北京搞过散手试点,当时来自民间的参赛拳手有上百人,包含了八卦、太极、大成等等拳种。“但比赛刚开始没两天,一看进入半决赛的选手,都是练习散打的了。”梅惠志说。

  民间武术大多没有经过对抗训练,一上擂台就“不管练习什么拳,最后都成了王八拳”。对抗起来根本没有反应,挨上两下就不打了。

  “有一位练习八卦掌的,比赛开始了,他还在那转圈子,被我们的队员追上去,踢了两脚,就不打了。”梅惠志说。那一次,最后冠军都被体校队员拿下。

  1987年,梅惠志带队参加武当山全国武术擂台赛,这一次的场面比北京的散手试点更加热闹,赛场上有扮成武松模样的,还有和尚、老道??比赛前表演,架势挺吓人。有人一掌把木板中的铁钉子拍了出来,可一上台打擂,那人只挨了一脚,自己就跳下擂台了。

  还有一位神秘人物,自己爬上擂台要求比赛,当地组织者要求他先报名,但遭到拒绝, 理由是“不敢留名,打完了再说”,并自称已经“毫无欲念,不吃荤腥”。看到这种情形,梅惠志专门交代队员不要踢第二脚,因为第一脚把人踢倒,第二脚必然会 踢头,这样会导致这些没有任何对抗训练的对手直接休克。

  对于民间有没有高手,著名武术家赵道新早在上世纪80年代就指出一个常识:“在那 些与世隔绝的不毛之地,消息闭塞,交流不便,物质贫乏,隐士们如何能启发悟性,拓展眼界,避免徒劳创作呢?又怎样能通过大量‘见手’来交流技术,衡量自 己?否则,又是怎么知道他们技高一筹,掌握精髓呢?生活问题怎样解决,营养哪里补给,资金、器具谁来提供?如果自食其力,花大量精力安排衣食住行,训练效 果怎能提高?”

  而在梅惠志看来,传统武术主要是训练方法和意识的落后,讲究的是口传心授,多是说 招说手,平时几无实战训练。“举个很简单的例子,对方边腿踢你,散手队员会一手格挡,一手反击。传统武术可不这样,他要先做一个云手,动作好看,但对方早 就踢到你了。我们同他们交流时,分出胜负也就一个照面,用的就是一个简单的迎击。”

  传统武术缺乏对抗训练导致了许多悲剧。1987年,在一次两省警察的集训中,某省一名练习传统武术的警察与另一省份练习散打的警察对练,结果因为前者从未做过对抗训练,在被摔起的时候没有任何防护意识与技巧,头部直接坠地,导致死亡。

中国武术极度缺乏技击性

  “但传统武术并不是这个样子的,在很久很久以前,传统武术也是一拳一脚。”中国武术院社会组副主任刘普雷说。

  作为格斗技术的武术本来就是打出来的,不是说出来的。除了在影视剧中,我们很少看到中国武术与外界的对决,那么中国武术的技击性到底如何?

  民间武术家赵道新认为,中国武术最大的骗局就是具有所谓的“技击性”。虽然传统武术有些技法还是包含着较高的技击性和潜在技击性,但赵道新肯定,当今中国武术在整体上极度缺乏技击性。以全球格斗界的战略眼光看,可以说已丧失了技击的竞争能力。

  在赵道新看来,今天的传统拳术与学院武术一样以套路为主,并混入了冒充古拳法的套路新作品。而套路与篮球、游泳、登山一样只是提高运动素质的锻炼方式,却不针对格斗需要,特意发展那些直接专用于格斗的素质和技术,从根本上说称不上是技击训练。

  从打法上看,传统武术在攻防技术中掺杂了大量象征性动作和门派仪式动作。这些动作与技击无关。从功法上看,传统武术仍保留着很原始、低效的操习,与其说是增长格斗实力,倒不如说是在祈祷、苦行和磨炼耐心。

  实际上,从民国时期以来,人们对于传统武术的套路对招一直在进行着理想主义的尝试。“2003年我还亲自参与过这种尝试。”刘普雷说。当时,散打王节目在湖南卫视火爆上演,四川的几位武术爱好者找到刘普雷,希望能够录制一些对招的节目。

  “在他们的想象中,仍然还是那种你一招白鹤亮翅,我一招黑虎掏心。”刘普雷说,早在70年代末80年代初练习散打之前,他就参与过这样的试验,但从来没有成功过。“你想啊,就像治病一样,怎么可能是开好了方子等病人呢。”

  但四川的那几位武术爱好者很固执,找到了一位喜好武术的企业家赞助,还找了四川省套路队帮忙,按照这种套路对打的方式进行,结果可想而知。“拿不出手!”赞助该项目的企业家对刘普雷说。

  相反,因为那些练习套路的孩子并没有经过技击训练,反而很容易受伤。“尤其是小关节之类的,动不动就会受伤。”刘普雷说。而这相对于现代搏击来说,无疑是没有任何技击性的。

  但刘普雷并不认为中国武术的竞技能力在国际上就毫无竞争力。他更加相信是规则原因,对竞技结果有直接影响。

  梅惠志也是同样的观点。“如果双方约定在相同的规则下进行三个月的训练,然后再进行对抗的话,胜负难料,反正是有得一打。”

  而在本刊记者的采访过程中,对中国功夫竞技水平最悲观的说法来自一位在国外学习柔术、到中国创办竞技俱乐部的华人。他认为以当前中国武术的竞技水平,需要三年的时间才能达到日美水平。

  国际拳坛为何不见中国选手

  既然中国武术的竞技水平在国际上并不落下风,为什么在诸如UFC、PIRDE、F—1等国际顶级的搏击赛事上,见不到中国选手的影子?

  “这是因为我们采用的是全运会体制,我们的精力没放在外出竞技上面,而要打F—1必须要长时间的竞技训练。”刘普雷说。

  1998年年底,刘普雷曾经带队去过K—1现场,当时主要是带套路队去做串场表演,其中还带了两位散打运动员做现场表演。“那是我第一次去K—1现场,到了那里才知道原来一个擂台赛能做成那个样子。”刘普雷回忆说,六万多人的现场,灯火辉煌,壮观极了。

  接触过K—1之后的中国散打选手曾经低调参加过这个比赛,但结果并不理想。不过,本刊记者采访中发现,实际上中国的散打运动员都比较想参加诸如K—1的国际顶级格斗赛事,一方面是为了证明自己的实力,另一方面是为了高额的奖金。

  但是,作为国家运动员的中国散打高手并不自由。首先从身份与资质上来讲,专业散打 队是行政性的,全运会的体制需要这些运动员全力以赴打好国内的比赛;而在技术实力上,我们的打点打分的比赛体制,并不适应F—1。参加F—1的拳手都是为 了高额奖金,“人家是挣钱来的,打起来很拼命。”刘普雷说。

  “其实,最大的问题是教练。”一位不愿透露姓名的搏击手说。国内的全运会体制使得职业教练以及运动员都必须围着全运会使劲,对于他们来讲,根本没有去国外顶级搏击赛事交流的必要。而更重要的是“他们输不起”,这直接关系到他们的根本利益。

  现代性质武术俱乐部体制在中国的发展尚处于艰难起步状态,要培养出自己的职业搏击手,还需要一段不短的路程。但好在中国武术协会对于俱乐部的建设越来越重视。“这是我们的一个方向。”刘普雷说。

  俱乐部的建设不仅能够极大地活跃中国的搏击市场,还能够拓展职业运动员的就业。或许在不久的将来,我们将不再感叹“国外的搏击手都是明星,国内的搏击手都是保安”的尴尬现状。

Saturday, 2 January 2010

China-ASEAN free trade area

The China-ASEAN free trade Area started in 2010. It is a good start for Asia, and eventually Japan and Korea will join the FTA to really make "Asia for Asia" a reality. Of course the US troops have to move their asses out of Korea and Japan. It will need a lot of visions and statecraft from the politicians in China, Japan and Korea.