Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Prostitute boycotts Chinese on ethical grounds

Prostitute boycotts Chinese on ethical grounds
One of the more touching messages I receive in the run-up to the outrageous execution of Akmal Shaikh in China this morning is from a London-based “working girl”, who tells me she is boycotting all Chinese clients for a year in protest.

Please, spare me any sanctimonious injunctions about her chosen way of life. She’s doing what she can. And how many business people have decided today to withdraw their services from the Chinese? I think, in this context at least, she is acting with great dignity and self-respect.

She writes:

Dear Father Pitcher,

I read your article on Akmal Shaikh with interest. It says the Chinese will face serious consequences if the execution goes ahead.

I don’t suppose you will find the following consequences serious, but I know some people who will..

[She then includes a link to her website]

That site is probably not worksafe if anyone is monitoring your internet usage, but it is my advert on [she includes an escort directory]. I am an escort. I’m boycotting Chinese passport holders for a year if the execution goes ahead. I can pick and choose my clients and I don’t need any from murderous regimes.

I’m in two minds about those from Hong Kong, but will allow Taiwanese.

[She then signs with what I take to be a real name, followed by her working name. I include neither here because, at the time of writing, I don't have her permission.]

I love that equivocation over Hong Kong. On her website, not yet updated after Mr Shaikh’s execution, she adds:

Incidentally, if you are the holder of a Chinese passport you had better get your booking in tonight. After Akmal Shaikh, the mentally ill man, is executed tomorrow – you are on short rations for a year! In fact, no rations at all. Diu lai no mo hai, far as I’m concerned.

Could someone translate that Chinese for me? I reply to her as follows:

Dear [.....],

Good for you! I think that’s a highly principled stand – and I think that if everyone similarly did what they could by way of trade sanctions then we might make some progress with the Chinese.

Thanks for writing and have a very happy New Year.

And I mean it. The whole exchange is strangely uplifting and I’m really glad she wrote to me. Bless you, [consider your name here], GP

Monday, 28 December 2009

China will deepen its political and economic reform

A friend forwards this article on Chinese military forces to be privatized on stock market. It is intended to mock those market worshippers in China.

201X年,中国政治经济深层改革正式启动。。。


首先是武警被拍卖,经过私有化改革之后的武警改名为中国武警股份有限公司。中国武警股份有限公司由北京中央政府控股40%,其余的60%则全球上市,在纽约股票交易所的拍照为CNMP 。

接下来,是军队被拍卖,经过私有化改革之后的军队改名为中国国防联合股份有限公司。中国国防联合股份有限公司下设两大相对独立的子公司,分别为中国北方国防联合股份有限公司和中国南方国防联合股份有限公司。中国北方国防联合股份有限公司本身也是由四大子公司所构成,分别为中国沈阳军事股份有限公司(SYMD)、北京军事股份有限公司(PKMD)、兰州军事股份有限公司(LZMD)和济南军事股份有限公司(JNMD)。中国北方国防联合股份有限公司则由三大子公司所构成,分别为南京军事股份有限公司(NKMD)、广州军事股份有限公司(GZMD)和成都军事股份有限公司(CDMD)。中国国防联合股份有限公司向北京中央政府承包中国国防业务,由北京中央政府控股50%,其余的则也在全球上市。

为了使得中国国防联合股份有限公司的管理迅速与世界接轨,前美国国防部长Rumsfeld被高薪聘请为董事长,改制前的原中国国防部长则留任为总经理。

由于业务上的某些冲突,在改制之后,中国武警股份有限公司的董事会则向证监会投诉中国国防联合股份有限公司属于是垄断企业,享有不正当竞争优势。比如说,在拉萨市的一次大规模武力冲突中,西藏地方政府向北京求援。随后,北京中央政府立即向市场公开招标“关于弹压西藏武力骚乱”的项目,结果由于中国国防联合股份有限公司以中子弹和神经毒剂以及地毯式轰炸作为卖点而成功中标,从而获得了整个项目,可是中国武警股份有限公司则因为装备不足,在其项目方案中仅仅只有催泪弹、装甲车和机关枪而名落孙山,从而直接导致CNMP在纽约股票交易所和上海股票交易所的市值惨跌60%之巨,沦为垃圾股,CNMP的董事会为此而一片哗然。

可是,证监会则因证据不足而拒绝了中国武警股份有限公司的投诉。痛定思痛之后,中国武警股份有限公司决心重振旗鼓,也向全球招标高薪聘请总经理职位以改良公司。经过一番激烈的角逐,最后原日本自卫队高级军官松井先生因其家族出现过类似于松井石根这样的名气颇大的人物而成功担任总经理。在接受中央电视股份有限公司的采访时,松井先生向记者公布了自己的改革方案------首先要加强硬件建设,比如说也已得到美国花旗财团的巨额贷款用以从俄罗斯购买轰炸机,从德国购买坦克;同时再来狠抓软件建设,比如说也已同中国法院股份有限公司签署协议,由中国武警股份有限公司来独家承包全中国的死刑执行项目,从而锻炼员工技能,提高员工业务水平等。。。

"unexpected return"


it is composed by someone who obviously miss Mao's era very much.

Sunday, 27 December 2009

Chinese Racism against Chinese

Chinese-Americans need not apply ... how to cope with others' racism


December 20, 2009

Wanted: Young, professional go-getter willing to relocate his/her life to the wild, wild East -- China -- to work for the Chinese media in an office where you need not only fluency in Mandarin, but a foreign complexion. Looking for candidates with a background in journalism, proficiency in spoken, reading and written Mandarin Chinese who value tolerance above the individual. Preference will be shown to blondes. Salary: $700/month, no benefits.

"It's not, how do Americans say, discrimination," my managing editor told me, as she recited the message come down the pipe from my publisher. "It's just that Nancy (the publisher) thinks a blonde would look more foreign."

My publisher held two resumes in her hands, both applications to replace my co-English editor at the bilingual magazine where I work in China.

One was submitted by a well-heeled and ambitious young Chinese-American woman, who recently graduated from UCLA's school of journalism and was looking for her first job. The second resume was submitted by an American blonde from Florida who worked in promotions for a foreign charity in town.

The blonde can't speak Chinese. The Chinese-American can -- fluently. That should have made the decision easy.

But it was discrimination and the decision of how to navigate that sensitive conversation, how to cope with another's racism and how to mediate between my own values and reality was anything but easy.

My editor asked me to tell the Chinese-American girl, when I met her for coffee next week, that she was not offered the job. There was no need for even an informational interview.

She wasn't offered the job because she looked too Chinese and my boss wanted someone who made the office look more international.

And that image was more important that the ability to communicate.

"That's nothing. Wait 'til you hear this one," my friend Gao Yan said. Gao is Chinese but holds citizenship in both China and America -- a rare and controversial duality he was granted in 1989, when he was protected under political asylum. Gao lived in Providence, R.I., for 16 years and returned to China when his American microbrewery opened it's first China plant in his home town, Nanjing.

"The first time I brought my director of marketing, an Italian guy from Providence, to China, those (expletives) thought he was the boss! They greeted us at the plane and led him, my assistant, down the red carpet!"

It's deplorable but understandable. A person of Chinese heritage often looks Chinese and it's likely, on first glance, he or she might be mistaken for being native.

A blonde looks much more foreign.

But in this situation that unsatisfactory logic escalated to an unacceptable level for several reasons.

First, a magazine is a print operation. This isn't CNN and we're not talking Andrea Koppel, Ted Koppel's Irish-looking daughter who reported from China in masterful Mandarin.

The blonde candidate wouldn't be on TV and she's not fluent. Second, the Chinese-American candidate simply wasn't wanted. If I insisted on hiring her, she would likely face inter-office discrimination and be offered a lower salary.

Imagine Connie Chung being un-marketable in China.

After an underwhelming interview, I shuffled the blonde's resume to the bottom of my stack and returned to the classifieds. Then a second Chinese-American's resume came in, and a third, and a fourth. One looked promising: journalism degree from NYU, native English speaker with fluency in Chinese, previous writing experience and a love of China's "often unrefined and instantaneous demands." I took it to my managing editor.

"Oh," she said. She didn't need to say more for the disappointment to register. Another ABC -- American-Born Chinese.

The dilemma I now find myself in is not who to hire, but rather should I even bother considering Chinese-Americans?

If I wanted to hire a Chinese-American, or a Chinese-Canadian, or a Chinese-Australian, I'd feel obligated out of mutual humanity to confess the managements' discrimination. And who would that benefit?

"Nice to meet you. Our office is either rejecting your application because you're not white enough or you can work for us for less money than someone less qualified. Your choice."

Is it better to be given the choice and be forced to face discrimination, or is it better to be protected, but denied? And if I chose the later, does it validate discrimination?

"Nice to meet you. Our office is either rejecting your application because you're not white enough or you can work for us for less money than someone less qualified. Your choice."

Gao Yan was granted a rare and controversial dual citizenship in what year?


Saturday, 26 December 2009

Christmas, and ChairmanMao-mas

Mao Zedong was born today 106 years ago(one day later than Jesus Christ). Many Chinese call for a national holiday to be named on this day, equivalent Christians' Christmas(圣诞节), Chinese may call it 毛诞节 or ChairmanMaomas, Chinese need a God badly.

Here is a recent article of leftist historical revison. It is more about the present politics than about the history.

Zhang Chunqiao is depicted as a genuine Marxist and political heir to Mao Zedong. Hua Guofeng is portrayed as a traitor.

还我江青、还我春桥、还我历史公道-纪念毛泽东116诞辰

    ...华岳论坛 - "http://washeng.net"



    33年的历史舞台上,该亮相的都亮相了,原先隐藏的面目也都自我暴露无法掩饰了。谁是谁非,谁奸谁忠,已经一清二楚。历史显现出以下各种面貌:叛徒可耻;走资投降派可恨;糊涂虫可悲;假革命派可笑;英雄可佩。

    (一)叛徒可耻:华国锋

    头一个要算的是华国锋的账。华国锋的三大罪状:摧毁文革,摧毁党,背叛毛泽东。

    ...华岳论坛 - "http://washeng.net"

    ......

    (二)走资投降派可恨:邓小平(附陈云、叶剑英)

    ....

    (三)糊涂虫可悲:邓颖超

    .....

Friday, 25 December 2009

Liu Xiaobo: An anachronistic Challenge


Liu Xiaobo, Chinese dissident writer, was sentenced to 11 years for his leading role in the Charter 08, an imitation of the Charter 77 initiated by Havel. Obviously Liu over many years has been determined to make an ideological stand against the Chinese state power. Chinese ruling clique has taken the challenge as intended and make Liu a show case punishment.

"Charter 77 (Charta 77 in Czech and in Slovak) was an informal civic initiative in Czechoslovakia from 1977 to 1992, named after the document Charter 77 from January 1977. Founding members and architects were Václav Havel, Jan Patočka, Zdeněk Mlynář, Jiří Hájek, and Pavel Kohout. After the 1989 Velvet Revolution, many of its members played important roles in Czech and Slovak politics. The group was linked to the National Endowment for Democracy."

What the Charter 77 has told us is: 1. those drafters later came to power, they are activists for political power; 2. it was closely linked to NED in the US; it functioned as a political opposition althought it claimed not to serve as a basis of political opposition and operate within the law of the country.

The Charter 08 is almost the same, except that it is not clear how much it is linked to the NED. But ideologically it share the same goal as NED and even the US' position on China. Its pedigree is from the cold war era. And it is obvious to the Chinese authority which has long abandoned its Communist ideology. In this sense, the Charter 08 is anachronistic.

The Czeck authority in 1970s treated those signitories harshly. The Charter 77 has support groups, but it did not get wide influence until the end of communist system in the east Europe. It remained mainly as a potential threat to the Communist regime waiting for its time to come. Chinese authority must have taken lessons from this and give those Charter 08 drafters similar treatment.

Comaring the two cases of Charter 08 and 77, the differences are obvious. 1. China is a very different country; 2. the time and outside environment is different. Chinese authority is no longer a die hard communist party, but a very power- interests group. China is a rising economy which is playing more and more important part in the interdependence of international economy, hence it prevent the West, esp. the US from applying the old cold war strategy on China.

Probably the last difference is intellectual change of tide in China and even in the world. Charter 77 may play an important part in the battle of liberal capitalism succeeding over communism. That is all right in 1980s and 90s. But in the new millennium, for China especially, the focus of the public attention is to enlarge public rights domestically and at the same time enhancing national status internationally with a consensus the west is not something Chinese can rely on or even trust.

Hence Liu Xiaobo is either a martyr too late for his time, or maybe too earlier.

Holy Testicles!圣诞节

The collective and "must shared" joys surrounded seclude one from the real world on Christmas day, not much news on TV and radio, except some yesterdays news. Radio stations broadcast Christmas songs and carols all day long, TV music channel the same. It is a bit mad in the eyes of an outsider like me, probably that is how a foreigner felt when he/she went to the red China during the Great Cultural Revolution years.

I have to work again, from early afternoon to midnight. I don't mind really, esp. it is double pay today. Yesterday I told colleagues christmas' in chinese could be translated into english as "the holy testicles", it is logical since some testicles must be involved in the big affair of making the great baby. Virgin marry is a myth. A female colleague said to us: happy testicles as her x'mas greetings.

the only cold news today is Liu Xiaobo, Chinese dissident writer, was sentenced to 11 years for his leading role in the Charter 08, a imitation of the Charter 77 initiated by Havel. Obviously Liu is determined to make an ideological stand against the Chinese state power. Chinese ruling clique has taken it as intended and make Liu a show case punishment. It looks to me a confrontation with a cold war origin.